
While Medea puts the Dragon to sleep, Jason and Orpheus take the Golden Fleece.
Argonauts are known as the heroes who accompanied Jason in his search for the Golden Fleece.
This Greek legend highlights Jason’s perilous voyage in which, after numerous risks, he comes out victorious thanks to the help received from unexpected allies bringing riches from their countries of origin.
Since the beginning of times, human evolution is marked by Innovation.
Fire, agriculture, democracy, steam machines, electricity, Internet … are all products of innovation which have made a mark in th the History of Mankind (and continue to do so).
Though faster, each time.
TV needed 38 years to get to a population penetration of 50%, Facebook had 100 million users in 9 months. 400.000 download applications are made each day with Apple’s OS system; a few years ago this did not even exist …
We are NOT ONLY immersed in an age of changes. We are immersed in a change of AGE.
If we search in Google today we will find 4.360.000 results related to innovation, approximately 20% more than only two years ago.
According to The Boston Consulting Group, in 2010 innovation was considered one of the strategic priorities for 72% of the companies on a global level. The curious thing about the research was that the immense majority of managers interviewed were satisfied with the levels of innovation obtained in their respective companies, while 64% of the employees in the same companies declared that the innovation level was frankly low. Something is clearly failing.
And which is the vital ingredient for a generalized advance to be made in the culture of innovation in a Company, country or society?
It is not enough to boost the process of generating ideas, the key lies in their diffusion.
An idea that is not communicated never reports a progress for society.
According to the growth model of Michael Kremer, economist and professor at Harvard, any individual in equal conditions has the same possibilities of innovating for society, designing something new, useful and profitable, when a correlation exists between size of population and the number of innovative ideas it produces.
According to this, the frequency of great ideas increases with the growth in population. This has very important derivatives, especially with those Core Businesses based in the world of ideas (such as for example technology or advertising).
If the potential of collective innovation is very superior to that of an individual mind, we should reflect on new solutions, new operating ways and new creative formulas based on cloud talent.
But we must be prepared for strong and powerful change barriers:
The same corporation that advocates the prosperities of “open innovation” gives the order to never use external resources.
Another Argonaut told me the other day that when trying to implement innovation initiatives within his great company, the Board Committee regarded him with distrust, being too worried about its own uncertain future.
To solve today’s problems the collaboration, ideas and perspective of all are needed.
To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln: “The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present”.
We count on more than 7 billion of potential innovative minds. Thanks to communication, citizens are conscious of the problem and destroy all the barriers to change they find in their way, or, at least, try to: Egypt, Yemen, Turkey … are examples of this.
The world is under a process of approval of the World Wide Mind, phenomenon such as Facebook is good proof.
Education is the most important of all pending assignments. This was one of the most important conclusions reached at the last Worldwide Innovation and Creative Talent Forum celebrated in Spain a few weeks ago (and which surprisingly not one news cast covered while talk shows continued to reach peak share).
The great emerging countries such as China, India and Brazil have invested enormously in infrastructure, technology and education during the period of economic boom. They sent thousands of innovation Argonauts to train in other shores searching for the Golden Fleece, which today they have brought back to their countries. Meanwhile, other markets such as Italy or Spain pay no attention to their future positioning and are at present at the end of the line in worldwide innovation.
A truly Darwinian ocean exists between an invention and an innovation, in which the original invention must literally survive in the “nature” of the business world.
A widely spread error is to limit innovation to disruption, understood as an overnight market breakup. Nothing further from the truth:
- First, innovation if made up of so many breakthrough innovations as of little changes in what already exists.
- Second, an innovation does not change people’s habits in a day but requires an adaptation period.
- Third, innovation must not be considered a result of ideas coming from privileged minds in moments of special enlightenment. Google would not be what it is today if it had not been able to learn from the contribution of millions of clients who use their platforms.
Innovation is inherent to “new” and it is only possible to move in the territory of “novelty” under a context of uncertainty. The culture of innovation does not exist where a culture of tolerance to failure is not to be found. How can one learn to walk if one is not willing to fall?
In my opinion, innovation within any company, but most of all in the ones who live on the vertex of what is new, starts by accepting that a magnificent idea can come from anywhere, not only from the organization, but from the biosphere surrounding it (clients, stakeholders, suppliers). Innovation is not a lineal but an absolutely organic process.
So the most important thing is to make the ground fertile in the culture of collective innovation, as DNA. But important also is to choose not only the idea but the moment to make it happen.
In Apple 1.500 business ideas were turned down before the Company focused in just 4 products, choosing the adequate timing to launch each one:
– Mac
– iPod
– iPhone
– iPad
The crisis has brought to light the importance of innovation for the sustainability of companies and their own society. Any company, especially if their core business is creativity, should adopt innovation as a permanent point in their agendas. Innovation is our greatest strength for finding opportunities and for being able to take advantage of present and future challenges. Without innovation the advancement of society is slowed down and thereby its economy.
This simultaneously occurs to the unstoppable evolution of businesses, where anticipating changes and possible impacts mid and long term is a key factor for success.
It is vital to form a vigorous team within the organization focused on identifying and analyzing future tendencies. It is absolutely necessary for a country, a company sector or a brand, to detect social, business, technological and scientific tendencies.
We should search for a focal point of innovation for Spain:
Silicon Valley represents technological innovation, New York financial innovation, Bangalore software innovation … we should find what Spain’s innovation focal point is.
Source: www.urenio.org/2006/08/12/global-innovation-clusters/
Innovation is the key for growth and competitiveness in the modern economy. The main problems facing today’s society (environmental, economic, energetic,) can only be resolved through innovation.
For sustainable innovation to happen in a concrete area a series of ingredients have to be on hand:
– The laws and politics of a given country must eliminate any barrier to sustainable innovation. As an example, the Worldwide President of Ikea classified Spain as the most difficult country in which to do business due to the complicated and slow bureaucratic processes.
– Companies: Efficient leadership will be the one able to establish an innovative culture encouraging the generation of ideas. Especially in those sectors in a critical reinvention phase (advertising, for example).
– The education system: The new society requires failure as a way of learning to be understood. The creation of true creative gymnasiums in schools is not only a recommendable but essential action. It must be pointed out that our education system is one of the less efficient and creative ones in the world.
– People: We are the centre of innovation. From us come the ideas, attitudes, and the motivations to continue or not creating. We are all important in the innovation chain.
– Social networks: They are the elements that join together the diversity of people and the heterogeneity of knowledge to make innovation possible and widespread.
– Social responsibility: However, there is a type of innovation which already exists, although not very developed, detectable by any cool hunter in the world:
– Open social innovation.
Bill Gates, in his speech at the World Economic Forum defined it as “creative capitalism”.
“There are two focuses in human nature: self interest and the caring for others. Capitalism cares for self interest in a useful and sustainable way, but only for those who can afford it. Governmental and philanthropic aid canalizes our concern for those who cannot pay. But to provide faster aid to the poor, we need a system which makes better use of the innovators and the companies than we now have.”
But if innovation is so attractive, why is it that not all Companies innovate?
It is not that easy. It has to be considered the new DNA of the organization and the leader given empowerment. In McCann we consider innovation as a business discipline. The Company provides all the abilities, tools and creativity to be at the service of idea generation and the necessary resources are provided for the transformation process of these innovation ideas.
However, great barriers exist that slow down the introduction of an innovation process in large organizations, among them:
– obsessed in day to day work
– finances focused on traditional areas (safest results) versus innovation (greater risk of failure)
– lack of commitment and motivation of the most powerful innovation team in any large company: its employees
– lack of an adequate balance between discipline and liberty
– lack of involvement with the organization’s mission
More and more, Argonauts of knowledge are needed.
“Knowledge is not impersonal, like money. Knowledge does not reside in a book, a databank, a software program; they contain only information. Knowledge is always embodied in a person, created, augmented, or improved by a person.”
– Peter Drucker